It began like a celebration.
Inside the intellectual sanctum of the University of the Philippines, students who topped their fields in AI, economics, and data science expected another chapter in AI’s victory lap.
But what they received hit harder than any forecast.
---
### A Maverick’s First Word Felt Like a Warning Bell
Plazo didn’t bring slides.
He didn’t open with results, charts, or jargon.
Just a line—spoken softly, but it detonated:
“AI can beat the market. But only if you teach it when to stop.”
Phones lowered. Pens stilled. Breathing slowed.
Because in that single sentence, he inverted their expectations.
They had come for acceleration. He offered brakes.
---
### Where AI Fails: Not in Math, But in Meaning
Plazo went on—not to destroy AI’s promise, but to deflate its mythology.
He curated real-case errors from the world of finance—
from sentiment models mistaking irony for optimism.
“These systems are echoes, not prophets.
Then came his challenge:
“Can your model understand the fear of 2008? Not the red charts. The pit in your stomach.”
---
### The Clash Between Confidence and Conviction
They questioned him. Sharply.
One researcher from NUS mentioned LLMs adapting in real time.
Plazo listened. Then countered.
“Knowing someone is angry doesn’t tell you what they’ll do with that rage.”
And to the idea of modeled conviction?
“You can code a thunderstorm. But you can’t predict where lightning will strike.
Conviction isn’t data. It’s resolve.”
---
### The Real Threat Isn’t AI. It’s Obedience.
His speech turned darker.
Plazo described a trader who used to study market structure.
Now? “He just waits for the signal.”
“This isn’t evolution,” he said.
“It’s abdication.”
But he wasn’t rejecting AI. Far from it.
His own firm uses AI—advanced, multi-layered, deep-learning systems.
“But humans still decide when to pull the trigger.”
Then he offered what one professor later called *the line of the decade*:
“‘The model told me to do it’—that’s the next generation’s version of ‘I was just following orders.’”
---
### Automation’s Temple, Shaken
In Asia, automation is scripture.
Dr. Anton Leung from Singapore, a leading voice in AI ethics, whispered during the break:
“This wasn’t technical. It was spiritual.”
In a quiet faculty roundtable afterward, Plazo reframed AI education:
“Don’t just more info teach how to build the machine.
Teach how to challenge it.”
---
### He Didn’t Sell Software—He Offered a Soul
His closing wasn’t a pitch. It was a reckoning.
“The market,” he said,
“isn’t an equation. It’s a novel—full of unreliable narrators, chaotic plotlines, and sudden reversals.
And if your AI doesn’t read character, it won’t understand the story.”
The crowd didn’t cheer. They *absorbed*.
Some said it wasn’t a lecture at all. It was prophecy.
For those who came to worship at the altar of the machine,
he didn’t crash their faith. He rebooted it.